So much can change in three months. In the December edition of our quarterly McKinsey Global Survey on economic conditions, respondents’ expectations for the global economy were largely stable with the previous quarter and more positive than negative.1 Now, amid a spate of policy shifts, uncertainty permeates views on the economy in the latest survey. Respondents are now equally likely to see geopolitical instability and changes in trade policy or relationships as disruptive forces, both in the world economy and within their countries. Consequently, respondents report more cautious views this quarter than last quarter on nearly every measure. They are much more likely now than in December to say economic conditions—both globally and in their own countries—will decline, though views differ between respondents in emerging and developed economies. Respondents also are less likely than they have been in recent years to expect their organizations’ performance to improve in the months ahead (see sidebar, “Methodology note”).
Trade and geopolitics now carry equal heft as perceived disruptive forces
Changes in trade policy and relationships are now at the forefront, alongside geopolitical instability and conflicts, of perceived disruptions to the world economy as well as in respondents’ countries. Geopolitical instability has been the most-cited risk to the global economy for the past three years. But trade has caught up: The share of respondents citing trade-related changes as one of the biggest disruptions to the global economy has more than doubled over the past six months and is now equal to the share pointing to geopolitical instability (Exhibit 1).
Geopolitical instability and trade changes remain the top two most-cited risks to economies in respondents’ countries, as was true in December. But, unlike last quarter, now respondents in every region point to either geopolitics or trade as the biggest disruption.2
Both globally and at home, fewer respondents than in December cite transitions of political leadership as one of the biggest risks. In place of political transitions, increased economic volatility has become a top three most-cited risk to the global economy, while domestic political conflicts round out the top three for respondents’ economies. Inflation remains one of the top five perceived risks to the global economy as well as to respondents’ economies, as it has been since 2021.3
Respondents are cautious about current and future conditions
Over the past year, smaller shares of respondents have reported improvement in global economic conditions (Exhibit 2). For the first time since March 2023, the share saying conditions are worse than six months ago is larger than the share reporting improvement. Similarly, when asked about their own countries, about one-third of respondents say conditions have improved, the smallest share since September 2020.
What’s more, for the first time since December 2022, the share of respondents expecting global conditions to worsen over the next six months is larger than the share expecting improvement. Additionally, respondents see a global recession as increasingly likely. When we asked last quarter about four scenarios for the world economy in 2025 to 2026, 53 percent of respondents chose one of two recession scenarios as the most likely to occur. Now, nearly seven in ten rank a recession scenario as most likely (Exhibit 3). The largest share of all respondents, 61 percent, cite a demand-led recession, in which rising uncertainty causes consumer confidence to drop.
Respondents remain more optimistic about the state of their own economies than about the global economy. They continue to see improvement in their countries as more likely than declining conditions. However, the share expecting improvement (39 percent) is the smallest since June 2022, and half of respondents predict increasing unemployment in their countries—the largest share since September 2020. Respondents in North America are the most likely to expect growing unemployment: 77 percent predict it, compared with 48 percent in December.
Respondents in emerging economies remain more upbeat
A closer look at the survey findings reveals a growing gap between sentiments in emerging economies, where the views are brighter, and those in developed economies. Respondents in emerging economies are much more likely than peers in developed economies to say global economic conditions have improved (Exhibit 4), and they are half as likely to predict declining conditions in the months ahead. Furthermore, respondents in developed economies are twice as likely as those in emerging economies to say their countries’ economies have weakened in the past six months—and they are more than twice as likely to expect worsening conditions in the next six.
Respondents in emerging economies are much less likely than those in developed economies to predict a recession in the global economy. Like respondents in developed economies, they view geopolitical instability and changes in trade policy as the top two biggest disruptions to both global and domestic economies, but smaller shares of respondents in these regions point to those two issues. Instead, they are much more likely than other respondents to see volatility in the financial markets as a global and domestic risk.
Company leaders train their focus on geopolitics and potential changes in trade policy
Geopolitics are also top of mind as a potential disruption to companies’ performance. For the first time since March 2022, private sector respondents view geopolitical instability and conflicts as the most likely risk to companies’ growth.4 Geopolitical instability has overtaken weak demand—the most-cited risk in the previous three quarters—as a cited disruption, followed closely by changes in the trade environment and trade relationships. The share citing changes in trade as one of the biggest risks to company performance over the next 12 months is nearly double the share citing the same six months ago.
However, some respondents see potential disruptions in trade as more of an opportunity than a risk for their companies. Twenty-three percent say potential disruptions in trade and trade policy are more of an opportunity, while 27 percent see the opportunity and risk as equivalent. Respondents in North America and Europe are more likely to view trade changes as a risk, whereas respondents in Greater China are much more likely than others to view it as an opportunity for their organizations.
While respondents remain more likely to expect improvement than decreasing profits and demand, the share expecting positive changes is the smallest in years. Fifty-five percent expect their companies’ profits to increase in the next six months, the smallest share since September 2022. And while the share of respondents expecting customer demand for their companies’ products or services to increase is the smallest since June 2020 (46 percent expect increasing demand), they remain more than twice as likely to expect improving demand than decreasing demand. What’s more, the share expecting their companies’ workforces to grow is the smallest since the June 2020 survey.5