H-O-T-T-O-G-O
| | |
Click to get this newsletter weekly |
| |
|
| | | |
| | When 26-year-old artist Chappell Roan, one of Gen Z’s newest icons, sings “Hot to Go!” she isn’t talking about the climate. Yet 2024 is shaping up to be one of the (if not the) hottest summers on record. Climate change is a top concern among corporate executives across sectors (including pharmaceutical-ingredients makers, airlines, and dairy producers), who are trying to reduce carbon emissions. Legislative and regulatory efforts around the world to curb climate change, meanwhile, are facing challenges of their own. “Our collective responsibility is to break down this thorny global problem into concrete and actionable steps,” writes McKinsey partner Alexis Trittipo. “That means asking, ‘What is my company or community doing to make itself resilient and hence more capable of thriving in this uncertain and hotter world?’”
Those questions are top of mind for Gen Z. We wrote last year that some Gen Zers are choosing jobs (or choosing to quit their current roles) based on a company’s sustainability policies.
Since then, some Gen Zers are integrating other sustainable behaviors into their everyday lives. Enter “underconsumption core.” Not to be confused with the economic theory of underconsumption, underconsumption core is a social media trend defined as buying only what one needs and making the most of what one already has. For some consumers, underconsumption core is, at its core, an attempt to be more sustainable. Rather than buying a new shirt, for example, a Z baby might upcycle or transform something they already own. (FWIW, upcycling is just one part of the circular economy; circularity more broadly could bring more than €500 billion in annual revenues to European consumer goods businesses by 2030, for example). But underconsumption core also reflects the fatigue some Gen Zers express over the influencer economy, as well as a practical response to the squeeze some Gen Zers have felt on their wallets. Buying less is less surprising when one has fewer funds at the end of every month. Some Gen Zers are prioritizing price over sustainability in their purchases, write McKinsey senior partner Sajal Kohli and coauthors. But this has more to do with Gen Zers making difficult trade-offs than losing interest in sustainability. Where does this all net out? At net zero, Gen Z hopes. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | —Edited by Alexandra Mondalek, editor, New York
| | |
|
Click to get this newsletter weekly |
| |
|
Have feedback or other ideas? We’d love to hear from you. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Copyright © 2024 | McKinsey & Company, 3 World Trade Center, 175 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10007
|
|
|
|
|